Which critique describes surrogacy as risky: legally, emotionally, and financially?

• A. Unnatural and Goes Against Some Religions
• B. Exploits Women: Can Be Viewed as "Womb-Renting"
• C. Risky: Legally, Emotionally, and Financially
• D. Baby Selling

Answer: (C)

The main idea being tested is recognizing that surrogacy can bring risks across several major areas of concern. The strongest critique is the one that explicitly labels surrogacy as risky in three dimensions—legal, emotional, and financial—because it acknowledges how complicated and multifaceted the process can be for all parties involved.

Legally, surrogacy can create questions about who has parental rights and when they are legally established, particularly if laws differ by jurisdiction or if an agreement isn’t enforceable. This can lead to delays, custody disputes, or the need for post-birth legal actions to confirm parentage.

Emotionally, there are deep attachments and expectations involved. The surrogate may form an emotional bond with the baby and face heartbreak if plans change, while intended parents may experience anxiety, fear of loss, or disappointment if outcomes don’t match their hopes or if relationships with the surrogate strain under the process.

financially, the process can be costly and unpredictable. There are medical expenses, agency or legal fees, and potential costs arising from complications or disputes. The financial obligations can extend beyond the initial agreement and may be affected by changing laws or contracts.

Because this critique explicitly flags risk in all three domains, it best captures the overall challenges associated with surrogacy. The other critiques raise important ethical or social concerns—such as moral objections, exploitation, or commodification—but they don’t specifically foreground the broad, cross-cutting risks in legal, emotional, and financial terms.